skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221184 Find in a Library
Title: Reducing the Harm: Identifying Appropriate Programming for Low-Risk Offenders
Journal: Corrections Today  Volume:69  Issue:6  Dated:December 2007  Pages:50-52
Author(s): Christopher T. Lowenkamp; Paula Smith; Kristin Bechtel
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 3
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article presents preliminary findings from a meta-analysis of existing research on how correctional programming has impacted offenders at low risk for reoffending, so as to identify which services are likely to have the greatest positive effect, as well as those likely to increase reoffending rates for low-risk offenders.
Abstract: The study found that the treatment effect for low-risk offenders was a slight decrease in reoffending; however, the confidence interval showed a wide range between the upper and lower levels, suggesting that the effect size calculated for the low-risk group should be interpreted cautiously. An increase in reoffending was found for the moderate-risk groups, and the high-risk groups experienced a decrease in reoffending. Mixed-risk groups experienced an 18-percent increase in reoffending; however, the small sample size suggests these findings should be interpreted with caution. The types of treatment used in the 42 studies eligible for analysis were substance abuse treatment and modification of antisocial thinking and attitudes. Treatment modalities were group milieu, cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, and therapeutic communities. Treatment locations included institutions and the community. Treatment formats were groups sessions and individual sessions. Thirteen studies involved low-risk offenders, and 14 studies included offenders classified as moderate risk. Twelve studies involved high-risk samples, and 3 studies provided treatment for groups with mixed-risk offenders. An extensive literature search identified all possible research that focused on program evaluation and risk. The selected studies were then narrowed based on their inclusion of specific criteria. These criteria required that only quasi-experimental studies with clearly defined treatment and comparison groups from an offending population were eligible (n=42).
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Recidivism causes; Recidivism prediction; Treatment effectiveness; Treatment offender matching
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.