skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221233 Find in a Library
Title: Which Sexual Abuse Victims Receive a Forensic Medical Examination?: The Impact of Children's Advocacy Centers
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect  Volume:31  Issue:10  Dated:October 2007  Pages:1053-1068
Author(s): Wendy A. Walsh; Theodore P. Cross; Lisa M. Jones; Monique Simone; David J. Kolko
Date Published: October 2007
Page Count: 16
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 1999-JP-FX-1101;01-JN-FX-0009;2002-J W-BX-0002
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The study examined the impact of Children’s Advocacy Centers (CACs) and other factors, such as child’s age, alleged penetration, and injury on the use of forensic medical examinations as part of the response to reported child sexual abuse.
Abstract: Results of this study suggest that CACs are an effective tool for furthering access to forensic medical examinations for child sexual abuse victims. Suspected sexual abuse victims at CACs were two times more likely to have forensic medical examinations than those seen at comparison communities, controlling for other variables; 48 percent of children at the CACs had a forensic medical exam compared to 21 percent of children at comparison communities. More females, younger children, White children, children with reported penetration, and victims who were physically injured while being abused were more likely to have exams. Non-penetration cases at CACs were four times more likely to receive exams as compared to those in comparison communities. About half of all exams were conducted the same day as the reported abuse in both CAC and comparison communities. The majority of caregivers were very satisfied with the medical professionals. Receipt of a medical exam was not associated with offenders being charged. More information is needed about how community structures, resources, and philosophical belief systems of professionals enhance or deter receipt of exams. Some communities have multidisciplinary teams and child abuse diagnostic centers that may be quite effective given geographic areas and limited resources. CACs are one model of service delivery. They are currently the only multidisciplinary investigation model that has a national membership board and a formal accreditation process. CACs should participate actively in the inquiry about developing national benchmarks or standards about referral criteria for forensic medical exams. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Child abuse investigations; Child protection services; Child Sexual Abuse; Child victims
Index Term(s): Child abuse detection; Child abuse reporting; Medical evaluation; Multidisciplinary Investigative Team; OJJDP grant-related documents; Victim medical assistance
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243095

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.