skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221234 Find in a Library
Title: Do Children's Advocacy Centers Improve Families' Experiences of Child Sexual Abuse Investigations?
Journal: Child Abuse & Neglect  Volume:31  Issue:10  Dated:October 2007  Pages:1069-1085
Author(s): Lisa M. Jones; Theodore P. Cross; Wendy A. Walsh; Monique Simone
Date Published: October 2007
Page Count: 17
Sponsoring Agency: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 1999-JP-FX-1101;01-JN-FX-0009;2002-J W-BX-0002
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The study examined whether the implementation of Children’s Advocacy Centers (CACs) improved caregivers’ and children’s satisfaction with investigations.
Abstract: The findings provided evidence that CACs might successfully improve the experience of nonoffending caregivers during investigations of sexual abuse. Because of the support provided by investigators, CAC caregivers were more satisfied with the investigation and interview process than those in the comparison sample; caregivers reported higher rates of satisfaction when their case was investigated through a CAC, compared to cases investigated in communities without a CAC, as well as a greater sense of comfort and safety during interviews. Still a small minority of children reported substantial dissatisfaction. Caregiver satisfaction measured by the Investigation Satisfaction Scale (ISS) was moderately high across both CAC and comparison samples, suggesting that bungled, insensitive investigations do not appear to be a widespread problem; instead, scores on the survey indicated that respondents were more satisfied. Specifically, caregivers’ satisfaction scores on the Investigator Response subscale were greater when investigators believed the allegations were valid and when cases involving Child Protective Services (CPS) were substantiated by that agency. Caregivers’ reflected a greater satisfaction rating on the Interview Experience subscale when a medical exam was provided, suggesting the possibility that medical professionals involved early in the investigation might offer a more patient-based and sensitive approach to interviews. Caregivers were less satisfied with the investigation when they rated their child as having greater problems with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Low satisfaction ratings might reflect poor investigations that distress children, or parents holding professionals accountable for their children’s mental health problems, or even the caregivers’ own distress. Unfortunately, there was no substantial evidence found showing that CACs improved children’s experience with investigations which is a cornerstone of the model; the CAC model promotes a reduction in the number of interviews to ease the investigation burden on children. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are detailed. Tables, references, appendices
Main Term(s): Child abuse investigations; Child Sexual Abuse
Index Term(s): Child victim interviews; Child victims; Medical evaluation; OJJDP grant-related documents
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243096

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.