skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221251 Find in a Library
Title: Predicting and Preventing the Theft of Electronic Products
Journal: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research  Volume:14  Issue:1  Dated:March 2008  Pages:11-37
Author(s): Rachel Armitage; Ken Pease
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 27
Publisher: http://www.springerpub.com/ 
Type: Program/Project Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The research presented within this paper was conducted as part of a 2-year project (Project MARC) to develop and render operational mechanism to assess the risk of theft of electronic products.
Abstract: It is the authors’ view that the crime risk assessment mechanism developed as part of this project will need to be sold to two audiences: crime control agencies that might alert consumers to risk and provide cautionary advice and manufacturers who would be asked to develop their products based upon the findings. The risk mechanism presented remains fit-for-purpose in relation to the first audience, but does not achieve the precision necessary for the second. Consultation with stakeholders yielded the common view that such a mechanism was worth pursuing, but that it must reflect the language of those who would use it. An extensive consultation from 10 European member states ensued. Participants were asked to rate a range of electronic products in terms of vulnerability and security, and to explain their ratings. Their responses were use to develop two checklists that incorporated a variety of factors, weighted according to the frequency with which they were expressed. The crime vulnerability checklist developed within this paper is judged fit-for-purpose as a provisional measurement. However, caution is urged in relation to the security checklist. This paper presents the findings from research conducted between 2004 and 2006 funded by the European Commission (Project MARC). Project MARC aims to develop a mechanism to assess the risk of theft of electronic products and take steps to operationalize the mechanism. Tables and references
Main Term(s): Crime Control Programs; Crime prediction; Crime prevention measures
Index Term(s): Crime prevention planning; Estimated crime incidence; Theft offenses
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243113

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.