skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221255 Find in a Library
Title: Validation of Risk/Needs Assessments in the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Final Report, December 2006
Author(s): Dr. David Simourd
Date Published: December 2006
Page Count: 35
Sponsoring Agency: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
Grant Number: 15288
Sale Source: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
1920 Technology Parkway
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Measurement/Evaluation Device
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The study examined the psychometric properties, reliability, and validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R), the Criminal Sentiments Scale-Modified (CSS-M), and the Hostile Interpretations Questionnaire (HIQ) among Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (PADOC) offenders.
Abstract: The results of the study indicate the psychometric properties of the three main PACOC assessment instruments have structural integrity and are comparable to other existing databases. The report describes the outcome of a large scale validation of three assessment instruments used by the PADOC for classification and treatment decisionmaking for offenders. The overall pattern of results of the validation of the LSI-R, the CSS-M, and the HIQ among PADOC offenders are positive; the instruments’ technical integrity among PADOC offenders is consistent with existing research, and is being properly administered. However, the relationship to outcome criteria showed weak relationships between the instruments and the predictive validity criteria, and were below comparable data. The PADOC should not be concerned by the predictive criteria results of the project since the history of appropriate correctional risk assessment instruments suggests the present results are an anomaly rather than a definitive conclusion. The application of these instruments in the case management practices of PADOC offenders is appropriate and relevant instruments for this purpose. Although it is not clear as to why the correlations with outcome criteria were so weak, a combination of methodology (archival data collection) and recent timeframe of adopting the instruments into routine practice might have played a role. Three chapters provide details for each individual instrument including data collection procedures, descriptive statistical and psychometric properties, validity, and a summary of the results. Various explanations and suggestions for future investigation are offered. Tables, references, appendices
Main Term(s): Evaluation measures; Medical evaluation; Pennsylvania; Psychological evaluation; Risk management
Index Term(s): Correctional staff needs assessment; Corrections costs; Corrections decisionmaking; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.