skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221296 Find in a Library
Title: Juror Attitudes and Biases in Sexual Assault Cases
Author(s): Natalie Taylor
Date Published: August 2007
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Institute of Criminology
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Publication Number: ISBN 978 7 921185 52 6
Sale Source: Australian Institute of Criminology
GPO Box 2944
Canberra ACT, 2601,
Australia
Document: PDF
Publisher: https://www.aic.gov.au 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This paper presents findings from two recent studies conducted by the Australian Institute of Criminology showing that juror judgments in rape trials are influenced more by the attitudes, beliefs and biases about rape which jurors bring with them into the courtroom than by objective facts presented.
Abstract: It is time to acknowledge that jurors do not (because they cannot) make objective judgments about consent and guilt based on the facts presented to them in court. Jurors actively interpret what they see and hear, based on their own knowledge, experiences, attitudes, biases and expectations. Identifying these beliefs and expectations and understanding how they impact on judgments relating to credibility and guilt is essential to understanding some of the barriers to successful prosecution and how prosecution rates might be improved in the future. It is particularly crucial in light of the fact that most sexual assaults occur in private, with no corroborating evidence, and involve one person’s word against the other. Research is needed to investigate the link between preexisting juror attitudes and judgments about credibility and guilt in the courtroom. Sexual assault has among the highest rates of acquittal and lowest rates of proven guilt compared with other offenses. Given that more than 70 percent of sexual assault incidents are not reported to police and only about 1 in 10 reported incidents result in a guilty finding, increasing conviction rates for sexual assault is a key issue for the Australian Criminal Justice System. This paper draws on two studies conducted to illustrate that juror judgments in sexual assault/rape trials are influenced more by the attitudes, beliefs, and biases about rape which jurors bring to the courtroom than by the objective facts presented, and that stereotypical beliefs about rape and victims of it still exist within the community. Figures, table, and references
Main Term(s): Jury research
Index Term(s): Acquittals; Australia; Conviction rates; Convictions; Discrimination; Juror characteristics; Jury decisionmaking; Jury subornation; Prosecution; Rape; Sexual assault; Sexual assault victims; Verdict prediction; Verdicts; Victim prosecution of offender
Note: AIC Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No. 344, August 2007; downloaded on January 23, 2008.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243163

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.