skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221316 Find in a Library
Title: Independent Review of the AFP Urgent Duty Driving and Police Pursuit Guideline Review 2007 (the internal AFP review)
Author(s): Alan Cameron
Date Published: July 2007
Page Count: 84
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Capitol Territory (ACT)
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Sale Source: Australian Capitol Territory (ACT)
Dept of Justice and Community Safety
PO Box 158
Level 9, Moore St.
Canberra ACT 2601,
Australia
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: The study provides an internal Australian Federal Police (AFP) overview on guidelines for urgent duty driving and pursuits.
Abstract: The overall conclusion of the internal AFP review was that the AFP Guideline is comprehensive, explicit, and appropriate. Police pursuits constitute an important public safety issue as well as law enforcement issue. The international and Australian research is remarkably consistent in its findings across time and location. Research shows the pursuits are relatively rare in police work, but when they occur, they typically are of short duration, arise as a result of a minor offense, and usually end without adverse incident. Accidents and escapes occur occasionally; however, injury and death are infrequent occurrences. There is a world-wide movement toward more restrictive pursuit policies. However, there is considerable dispute as to how detailed and prescriptive the policy should be. Most authors conclude that allowing the individual officer relative autonomy in the decisionmaking process (under the direction of clear guidelines) is a more sensible approach then implementing a restrictive and prescriptive policy. There is wide-spread agreement in the literature in calling for better on-going training for officers as well as more severe penalties for those who flee from police. The overview provides several recommendations for revision of the reviewed current guidelines. Bibliography, appendices
Main Term(s): Australia; Police driver training; Police policies and procedures; Police procedures training; Police pursuit driving; Police vehicular accidents
Index Term(s): Driver training; Legislation; Literature reviews; Police cars; Program evaluation review techniques
Note: Downloaded January 23, 2008
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243183

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.