skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221360 Find in a Library
Title: Analysis of Bank Dye Evidence and the Challenges of Daubert Hearings
Author(s): Pamela C. Reynolds
Date Published: January 2008
Page Count: 5
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Quantico, VA 22135
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Laboratory Branch
2501 Investigation Parkway
Quantico, VA 22135
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Technical Assistance
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explains how the analysis of bank dye-pack evidence can meet the challenges of a "Daubert" hearing.
Abstract: In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993), the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling made judges responsible for evaluating scientific testimony in order to determine whether it is both relevant and reliable for the case at issue. The Daubert case provides a set of guidelines that can be used to assist a judge in determining the reliability of the scientific technique being presented. The guidelines focus on whether the method can be tested, the known or potential error rate, whether there are standards for controlling the technique, whether the technique is generally accepted in the scientific community, and whether it has been subjected to peer review/publication. This article explains how each of these guidelines can be met under the FBI Laboratory's method of analyzing bank dye-pack evidence. Regarding the testing of the method, the analysis of bank dye-pack evidence should be done under the guidance of a validated standard operating procedure that details the materials and processes that will produce a given result. When procedures are validated, they are subjected to various testing in order to determine whether the technique is reliable and reproducible, as well as the detection limits for a particular chemical. Regarding known or potential error rate, an error rate determined by means of repetitive blind studies has not been established for bank dye-pack evidence analysis; however, conclusions regarding the presence of bank dye-pack chemicals rely on the results of multiple tests; the use of positive and negative controls ensures reliable results are obtained. The techniques for analyzing bank dye-pack chemicals and the techniques used for analysis have been published in a variety of literature.
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Bank robbery; Evidence; Forensic sciences; Hearings; Investigative techniques; Scientific testimony; US Supreme Court decisions
Note: From Forensic Science Communications, N 1, V 10, January 2008; downloaded January 24, 2008.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.