skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221370 Find in a Library
Title: Scientific Working Group on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Topics to Consider in Preparation for an Admissibility Hearing on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
Corporate Author: Scientific Working Group on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (SWGSTAIN)
United States of America
Date Published: January 2008
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: Scientific Working Group on Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (SWGSTAIN)
Quantico, VA
US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Quantico, VA 22135
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Laboratory Branch
2501 Investigation Parkway
Quantico, VA 22135
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Technical Assistance
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper provides guidance on how to prepare for an admissibility hearing that addresses bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA).
Abstract: In most settings, an admissibility hearing is for the purpose of testing the general acceptance of a scientific technique and/or discipline through the testimony of experts, rather than to advance the evidence yielded by the technique or dispute its role in the case-in-chief. In addition to reviewing the testimony presented at an admissibility hearing, the court may also consider and/or require the submission of materials such as scientific literature, transcripts of previous BPA testimony, previous appellate and/or trial court decisions, and/or the qualifications of any expert who may provide testimony at any subsequent admissibility hearing. A BPA expert should be prepared to provide documentation of his/her training and experience. He/she should also consider using visual aids in order to demonstrate major points that support the scientific validity and methodology of BPA. After reviewing admissibility standards for scientific evidence under the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in "Daubert" (1993) and the earlier decision in Frye (1923), the paper poses and answers questions likely to be central in a BPA admissibility hearing. The questions and issues discussed are the nature and characteristics of BPA, the purpose of BPA, the principles of BPA, the methodology used when conducting BPA, the scientific principles and methods of BPA that are used in other fields, the general acceptance of BPA methods in the scientific community, the use of BPA in the forensic science community throughout the world, published studies on the reliability and validity of BPA, error rate associated with BPA methodology, and administrative controls for ensuring that BPA results are reliable. Guidance is also provided on the preparation of testimony. 2 notes
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Blood stains; Blood/body fluid analysis; Hearings; Rules of evidence; Scientific testimony
Note: From Forensic Science Communications, N 1, V 10, January 2008; downloaded January 24, 2008.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.