skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221434 Find in a Library
Title: Sex Offender Residence Restrictions: Sensible Crime Policy or Flawed Logic?
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:71  Issue:3  Dated:December 2007  Pages:2-9
Author(s): Jill Levenson Ph.D.; Kristen Zgoba Ph.D.; Richard Tewksbury Ph.D.
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 8
Document: HTML
Publisher: https://www.uscourts.gov 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper reviews research relevant to the effectiveness and impact of residence restrictions for sex offenders and draws implications for practice and policy.
Abstract: Although 22 States now have laws that restrict where sex offenders can live, with 1,000 to 2,500-foot exclusionary zones being most common, research on the effects of sex-offender residence restrictions is limited. Only one study (Minnesota Department of Corrections, 2007) has specifically examined the relationship between residence restrictions and reoffending. That study was prospective, because no such law was in place where the study was conducted (Minnesota). There is a growing body of evidence, however, that residence restrictions have unintended consequences for sex offenders and communities. These adverse effects include homelessness for sex offenders; transience; lack of accessibility to social support, employment, and rehabilitative services; registry invalidity; and the clustering of sex offenders in poor, rural, or socially disorganized neighborhoods. Residence laws are often based on erroneous assumptions about sex-offender high reoffending rates and the belief that most sex offenders target strangers for victimization. In addition, they are rarely coupled with the administration of proven risk-assessment instruments and procedures. In the absence of evidence that residence restrictions are effective in achieving their intended goal of improved community safety, their unintended adverse effects may outweigh their benefits. It is crucial that research be conducted to determine whether residence restriction laws are effective. 84 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Corrections effectiveness; Effectiveness of crime prevention programs; Post-release programs; Reentry; Research uses in policymaking; Sex Offender Registration; Social reintegration
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243306

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.