skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221472 Find in a Library
Title: Queensland Law Reform Commission: Public Justice, Private Lives: A Companion to the Confidentiality Report
Corporate Author: Queensland Law Reform Cmssn
Date Published: August 2007
Page Count: 74
Sponsoring Agency: Queensland Law Reform Cmssn
Brisbane Qld 4003, Australia
Publication Number: ISBN 978-0-7242-7754-4
Sale Source: Queensland Law Reform Cmssn
PO Box 13312
George Street Post Shop
Brisbane Qld 4003,
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: Intended for members of the Queensland public who are not legal experts, this paper is a guide to the longer two-volume report by the Queensland Law Reform Commission entitled, "Public Justice, Private Lives: A New Approach to Confidentiality in the Guardianship System."
Abstract: An overview of current confidentiality provisions of Queensland guardianship laws notes that these laws allow the tribunal to make "confidentiality orders" in some cases. These orders are not commonly made, but are important because of their potential impact on the people involved. These confidentiality orders can prevent specified people from attending a hearing or part of a hearing, from seeing a document being considered by the tribunal, or from knowing the tribunal's decision or the reasoning upon which a decision is based. Confidentiality provisions also prevent the publication of information about what happens before the tribunal. The Commission's consultation found that people strongly support greater openness in the guardianship system, and the Commission agreed that the system currently leans too much toward confidentiality. In its recommendations for law reform, the Commission strives for a balance between the principle of open justice, the requirements of procedural fairness, and the need for confidentiality/privacy for the parties involved. The Commission believes greater openness will increase public confidence in guardianship proceedings by bringing more accountability and transparency to guardianship decisionmaking processes. More openness will also provide better outcomes for impaired adults put at risk by the failure to disclose information. Greater openness contributes to better decisionmaking, because it promotes more complete and accurate information. This paper presents the Commission's recommendations for improving guardianship by providing a better balance between openness and confidentiality, which includes having more exceptions to confidentiality provisions. Appended overview of guardianship and a glossary
Main Term(s): Court procedures; Foreign courts; Foreign laws
Index Term(s): Australia; Confidential records access; Law reform
Note: MP No. 42; for volumes 1 and 2 of the full report, see NCJ-221473-74.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.