skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221478 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of Employment, Family Structure, and Income on NIBRS Offense, Victim, Offender, and Arrest Rates
Journal: Justice Research and Policy  Volume:9  Issue:2  Dated:2007  Pages:9-29
Author(s): Roland Chilton; Wendy C. Regoeczi
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 21
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the importance of male employment, income, racial composition, and family structure for an offense known measure, a victim measure, an offender measure, and two arrest measures of crime.
Abstract: Results indicated that the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), with details on the offenses, victims, arrestees, and offenders, can address research that has relied on the use of offense, victim, or arrestee rates to approximate offender rates. The findings demonstrate that for the race-specific analysis of violent offenses, both victim and offense-known rates may be poor substitutes for an offender rate. The NIBRS offender rate is the most logical and useful offender measure because it provides a direct indication of the age, race, and sex of most offenders whether or not an arrest occurs. However, when it is not available, as it is not in the traditional Uniform Crime Report (UCR) program, an arrest measure provides a reasonable but not perfect substitute. Moreover, analysis of NIBRS arrest data for 2002 to 2004 indicates that modified arrest rates provide a closer approximation to pure offender rates than unmodified arrest rates. This further suggests that when offender rates are not available, the use of modified arrest rates is a more accurate measure of offending than either victimization rated or unmodified arrest rates. For race-specific measures even the best murder or robbery victim rate is a poor substitute for an offender rate, and offense-known measures are even poorer measures of offending. In addition, and unexpectedly, it was found that race-specific victim and offender counts and rates take much of the mystery out of the frequently used and variously interpreted variable percent Black. Data were collected using NIBRS 2002 to 2004 robbery and murder counts and census 2000 data for 166 cities. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Offender classification; Offender statistics; Offender tracking systems
Index Term(s): Crime data files; Data analysis; Data collections; Databases; Employment and expenditure data
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.