skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221535 Find in a Library
Title: Critique on Traditional Courts, Community Courts and Conflict Management
Journal: Acta Criminologica  Volume:20  Issue:1  Dated:2007  Pages:144-155
Author(s): D. Bogopa
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 12
Document: PDF
Publisher: http://search.sabinet.co.za/crim/acta/ 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: South Africa
Annotation: This study examined traditional and community courts in South Africa and their ways of managing conflict, with attention to the factors that have drawn the most criticism.
Abstract: Among South Africa's traditional courts, the tribal court is the highest court in the tribe. The chief is the only person who is authorized to pass judgment. Adult men in the tribe play a central role in assisting the chief in his judicial duties. Adult men attend court sessions and may participate in the cross-examination of the parties to lawsuits as well as witnesses. Traditional courts settle disputes that involve two parties, for example, a victim and an offender. In criminal cases, the traditional court attempts to reconcile the victim and offender. Civil and criminal cases stemming from the same event are often heard simultaneously. An offender may be sentenced to some punishment and to the payment of compensation. The accused person must prove his/her innocence. There is no legal representation. Community courts are created by communities in order to deal with disputes locally. These courts tend to be formed in communities where the police have failed to address crime over a long period of time. Critics view these courts as vigilante courts based on cases in which alleged offenders were killed or severely injured only to be subsequently found innocent. Case studies are presented to show instances of brutality without determining the merits of the case, bias by the courts against defendants, mob influence in court decisions, bias against women, and lack of training for court officials. The South African Law Commission (1999) has recommended that traditional courts continue to be recognized where they are already established, but with the assistance of paralegals appointed by the Ministry of Justice. An 18-item bibliography
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Alternative court procedures; Alternative dispute settlement; Court procedures; Cultural influences
Note: Downloaded February 13, 2008; To access the full text PDF: 1) select the provided link; 2) from the Acta Criminologica Web site, select "Table of Contents"; 3) select the corresponding Volume and Issue (see the NCJRS abstract record for the exact Volume and Issue); 4) scroll the Table of Contents to the exact article; and 5) click on the "full text" icon
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243416

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.