skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221545 Find in a Library
Title: Restorative Justice with an Explicit Rehabilitative Ethos: Is This the Resolve to Change Criminality?
Journal: Acta Criminologica  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:2007  Pages:43-60
Author(s): C. Bezuidenhout
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 18
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: South Africa
Annotation: In this paper, all the different arguments regarding restorative justice are considered and examined in order to position it in relation to mainstream criminal justice and rehabilitation.
Abstract: To suggest that restorative justice will be more effective when accompanied by an explicit rehabilitative culture before it has been settled and accepted as the future of criminal justice is premature. Rehabilitation is a complex process and would usually not be accomplished after one restorative justice meeting. Proper macro-scale research is needed before the question is answered and policymakers can be influenced. The key to restorative justice’s future lies in a modified criminal justice system policy and a move away from one-dimensional approaches to a synthesis of best practice. This policy must emphasize reparation, rebuilding, and reintegration and must address the need of the victim, the offender, and the community. A criminal justice system that follows these principles should exist in tandem with other justice philosophies, such as deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. In addition, restorative justice should complement the criminal justice system. Despite ongoing research there is no consensus among scholars regarding the definition and meaning of restorative justice. The literature is also unclear as to whether it should be a mainstream role-player in criminal justice. This paper addresses the meaning and effectiveness of restorative justice as a formal justice alternative for rehabilitation. It also discusses restorative justice vis-à-vis the problem of recidivism. Lastly, an interpretation of restorative justice’s future prospects in an official judicial process, with or without an explicit rehabilitative culture, is canvassed. References
Main Term(s): Criminal justice system analysis; South Africa
Index Term(s): Conflict resolution; Criminal justice research; Criminal justice system reform; Post-release programs; Punishment; Rehabilitation
Note: To access the full text PDF: 1) select the provided link; 2) from the Acta Criminologica Web site, select "Table of Contents"; 3) select the corresponding Volume and Issue (see the NCJRS abstract record for the exact Volume and Issue); 4) scroll the Table of Contents to the exact article; and 5) click on the "full text" icon Downloaded on February 13, 2008.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.