skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221574 Find in a Library
Title: Mandated Reporting Among School Personnel: Differences Between Professionals Who Reported a Suspected Case and Those Who Did Not
Journal: Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma  Volume:15  Issue:2  Dated:2007  Pages:21-37
Author(s): Ernst O. VanBergeijk
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 17
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the reporting experience of designated reporters within the New York City public school system.
Abstract: Results indicate that there are a number of factors that impact the reporting of child maltreatment by school personnel. The strongest predictor of whether a designated reporter referred the last suspected case of child maltreatment to the State Central Registers (SCR) was their level of confidence that abuse had occurred. Reporting maltreatment is embedded in ethical considerations such as weighing the child’s right to protection with the family’s rights to privacy, cultural variation in the child rearing, and the possibility of State intervention. The reporter’s level of confidence predicted reporting behavior; low levels of confidence accurately reflected a lack of reportability of a particular case. Because there is an intuitive relationship between confidence and accuracy, improving the training of reporters would improve reporters’ confidence in their ability to make a determination of maltreatment, and increase their understanding of State requirements for reporting. The designated reporter’s job title was also predictive of reporting behavior. When compared to all other professionals who fill the role of designated reporters, the odds that a psychologist reported their last suspected case of abuse and neglect was 91 percent less than other professions. Psychologists either delayed a report or were less consistent in their reporting than other professionals. The presence of obstacles also predicted reporting behavior. For each obstacle that a designated reporter identified, there was a 19 percent decrease in the odds that a respondent reported the last case they suspected. Individuals who had negative experiences with Child Protective Services (CPS), difficulty communicating with the agency, or held negative opinions about the agency were less likely to report suspected cases of abuse and neglect. Although mandated reporters are given immunity from criminal or civil liability as long as they report in good faith, one quarter of the respondents feared testifying in court and legal liability. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Child abuse reporting; Psychologists; Public schools
Index Term(s): Child Protection; New York; Professional conduct and ethics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.