skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221619 Find in a Library
Title: Type of Contact and Evaluations of Police Officers: The Effects of Procedural Justice Across Three Types of Police-Citizen Contacts
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:35  Issue:6  Dated:December 2007  Pages:612-621
Author(s): William Wells
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 95-IJ-CX-0015
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study estimated the effects of citizens’ perceptions of procedural justice on overall ratings of officer performance across three types of police-citizen encounters.
Abstract: Findings of the study showed actions that reflect procedural justice and outcome-oriented behaviors, including professionalism, competence, and contact-specific behaviors, had important effects on how citizens evaluated the officers with whom they had contact. Procedural fair treatment appeared to matter least to victims of crime. These citizens were likely to provide favorable evaluations of officers who were professional, appeared competent, recontacted them as expected, made them feel secure, and provided a referral to another agency. In addition, citizen demographics were relatively unimportant determinants of the overall ratings the officers received. Researchers and practitioners have attempted to isolate the factors that drive citizens’ perceptions and evaluations of the police because these judgments are viewed as critical. This study had two purposes: (1) to contribute to the growing body of work that has examined the effects of procedurally fair treatment on citizen evaluations of legal authorities, and (2) to examine whether the relative effects of citizens’ perceptions of procedural fairness varied across three distinct types of police-citizen contacts. Data were gathered as part of an evaluation of the Lincoln, NE Police Department’s Quality Service Audit (QSA). The QSA survey solicited information about different aspects of officer performance during contacts with citizens. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Police-citizen interactions
Index Term(s): Police community relations; Police officer performance evaluations; Police performance evaluation; Public Opinion of the Police; Services effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.