skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221631 Find in a Library
Title: Is Jury Selection Fair?: Perceptions of Race and the Jury Selection Process
Journal: Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society  Volume:20  Issue:4  Dated:December 2007  Pages:445-468
Author(s): Karen McGuffee; Tammy S. Garland; Helen Eigenberg
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 24
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study explored jurors perceptions of whether the jury system is fair, and more specifically, the role, if any, race plays in perceptions of jury selection.
Abstract: The study failed to find sufficient evidence that jurors believed that racial bias had an impact upon their ability to serve on juries, and failed to establish a relationship between views about racial representation on juries and system fairness. It did, however, find that a significant minority of jurors questioned the racial neutrality of the system, which in turn decreased perception of system fairness. In general, respondents indicated a great deal of faith in the jury system, and the overwhelming majority of respondents, 92 percent, believed that most jury verdicts were correct, and 96 percent of the respondents believed the juries try hard to do the right thing. Respondents were slightly less apt to believe that the justice system was fair, although most respondents, 83 percent, found the system equitable. Respondents, on the whole, found the system more fair than unfair. The respondents reported more conflicting attitudes about whether or not the criminal justice system and the jury process was race neutral. Over half of the respondents, 52 percent, agreed that it was important for African-Americans to have African-Americans on the jury in order to get a fair trial. Respondents were slightly less apt to believe that racial composition of the jury is important for Whites; 42 percent of the respondents reported that it is important for Whites to have other Whites on the jury to get a fair trial. About one-fourth, or 26 percent, of the respondents believed that African-Americans were more likely to be dismissed from jury duty than were Whites. About 18 percent of the respondents believed that Whites were more apt to convict than minorities. Only 7 percent of the respondents believed that Whites were more fair in jury decisions than minorities. Tables, figure, notes, references
Main Term(s): Court procedures; Court studies; Jury research; Jury selection
Index Term(s): Discrimination; Jury selection challenges; Race; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.