skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221642 Find in a Library
Title: Mandatory Reporting Legislation in the United States, Canada, and Australia: A Cross-Jurisdictional Review of Key Features, Differences, and Issues
Journal: Child Maltreatment  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:February 2008  Pages:50-63
Author(s): Ben Mathews; Maureen C. Kenny
Date Published: February 2008
Page Count: 14
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study provides a current and systematic review of mandatory reporting legislation in the three countries that have invested most heavily in them, the United States, Canada, and Australia.
Abstract: Mandatory child abuse reporting laws have developed a particular detail in the United States, Canada, and Australia as a central part of the governments' strategy to detect cases of abuse and neglect at an early stage, protect children, and facilitate the provision of services to children and families. Legislatures in these three countries have given detailed attention to the development of these laws over several decades, and the laws of these jurisdictions continue to evolve in response to new phenomenon and evidence of successes and failures in child protection systems. However, the laws differ in significant ways, both within and between these nations, with the differences tending to broaden or narrow the scope of cases required to be reported. A comparison of key elements of these laws was conducted, disclosing significant differences and illuminating issues facing legislators and policymaking bodies and countries already having the law. Governments throughout the world are increasingly engaged with the challenge of detecting cases of maltreatment at an early stage, to protect children, and to facilitate the provision of services. Many nations have enacted legislation commonly known as mandatory reporting laws, requiring designated persons to report suspected abuse and neglect. The International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect sought information from 161 countries about matters including the presence of legislative and policy based reporting duties. Of the 72 countries responding, 49 indicated the presence of such duties in law or policy, and 12 respondents indicated the presence of voluntary reporting by professionals. Some jurisdictions, like the United Kingdom and New Zealand, have chosen not to enact mandatory reporting laws for reasons including the perceived danger of over reporting of innocent cases, which is seen as adversely affecting the interests of children and families by diverting scarce resources from previously substantiated cases. Tables, references
Main Term(s): Australia; Canada; Child abuse detection; Child abuse reporting; United States of America
Index Term(s): Abused children; Child abuse investigations; Child abuse reporting statutes; Child protection laws; Foreign policies; US/foreign comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243525

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.