skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221672 Find in a Library
Title: Denture Marking--Patient Preference of Various Methods
Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences  Volume:52  Issue:6  Dated:November 2007  Pages:1338-1349
Author(s): Raymond Richmond B.Sc., M.Phil; Iain A. Pretty B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D.
Date Published: November 2007
Page Count: 12
Publisher: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ 
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In order to determine dental patients' preference for various methods of marking their dentures with patient identification, 100 patients served by the Manchester Dental Hospital (England) were shown a range of denture labeling methods in a visual questionnaire and asked to rank them by preference.
Abstract: The most preferred method of denture marking was the use of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (top choice of 38 percent of respondents), followed by an identification technique that used onion paper (24 percent rated this method first). The least preferred method of marking dentures was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange, with 71 percent of respondents rating this as the least preferred method. A significant finding from the study was that 99 percent of the denture wearers would accept the concept of marking their dentures for identification. This acceptance contradicts the anecdotal evidence from dentists, who have often stated that patients do not want such identification. Respondents were particularly positive about such identification marking when they were informed that it could include information on their medications, blood group, and next of kin. A number of patients, however, were somewhat reluctant to include too much information on their dentures, believing it to be a potential violation of their privacy. The willingness to accept such technology was not apparently related to the patient's age or gender. The respondent sample was shown 10 8" x 10" color photographs, each portraying a different method for marking dentures for the wearer's identification. 2 tables, 10 figures, and 17 references
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Dental analysis; Foreign criminal justice research; Property identification; Public Attitudes/Opinion; United Kingdom (UK); Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243555

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.