skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221699 Find in a Library
Title: Administrative Segregation for Mentally Ill Inmates
Journal: Journal of Offender Rehabilitation  Volume:45  Issue:1/2  Dated:2007  Pages:149-165
Author(s): Maureen L. O'Keefe
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 17
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the prevalence of offenders in the Colorado Department of Corrections with mental illness (OMIs) in administrative segregation (AS) relative to the general population to determine the frequency at which they are being held in a highly restrictive environment.
Abstract: In general, segregated offenders were discernibly different from their non-segregated peers, especially on criminal history indicators and institutional behaviors. In particular, offenders involved with security threat groups or engaged in gang-related activities were targeted for administrative segregation (AS) placements at a rate 4.5 times of those who had no known involvement. Specifically, offenders with mental illness (OMIs) were found in AS at a disproportionately high rate, a disparity which has grown over recent years in conjunction with severely restricted funding for program services. Mental illness was found to be the third strongest predictor of AS classification. OMIs were responsible for a significant number of disciplinary violations within the prisons, but mental illness was a better predictor of AS classification than disciplinary infractions. OMIs were less likely to be identified with security threat groups, suggesting that their acting out might be directly related to symptomatic expression of their illness. This is supported by clinician ratings of OMIs as having more severe psychopathology paired with high activity levels and low impulse control. Largely the result of prison officials needing to safely and efficiently manage a volatile inmate population, administrative segregation, or supermax facilities are criticized as violating basic human needs, particularly for mentally ill inmates. This study compared Colorado OMIs to non-OMIs in segregated and non-segregated environments. Tables, figures, references
Main Term(s): Mentally ill inmates
Index Term(s): Colorado; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Inmate discipline; Inmate segregation; Maximum security; Mentally ill offenders; Prisoner's rights; Segregation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.