skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221804 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Securing America's Passenger-Rail Systems
Author(s): Jeremy M. Wilson; Brian A. Jackson; Mel Eisman; Paul Steinberg; K. Jack Riley
Corporate Author: Rand Corporation
United States of America
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 144
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Rand Corporation
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
Publication Number: ISBN 978-0-8330-4117-3
Sale Source: Rand Corporation
1776 Main Street
P.O. Box 2138
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study provides a framework that security planners and policymakers can use to prepare for, and protect against, threats to and vulnerabilities of rail systems across the United States focusing on passenger, as opposed to freight, rail systems.
Abstract: Three types of Security-Improvement Options (SIOs) identified in this study include: process-based, technology-based, and infrastructure- or facility-modification. The SIOs identified are specific to the notional (or hypothetical) rail system analyzed. The analysis captures a point in time; the attractiveness of different SIOs in the prioritization is driven by the current costs for those options and their current perceived effectiveness. As costs change and the effectiveness of different options against threats of concern become clearer, the options will need to be revisited to assess any necessary shifts in priority. Notwithstanding study limitations, the methodology presented is useful for planning rail-security options. To understand the vulnerability of rail systems to the terrorist threat, this study constructed a notional rail system. A vulnerability assessment was conducted identifying 11 potential target locations within a notional rail system and 8 potential attack modes. These targets and attack modes were combined to produce 88 different attack scenarios of concern. The end objective was to identify additional increments to security that could be implemented in a cost-effective manner. The goal of this study was to develop a framework for security planners and policymakers that could be used to guide security planning and operational decisions; a framework that is driven by assessments of the foremost threats to, and vulnerabilities of, passenger-rail systems and of the cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies for addressing those threats and vulnerabilities. Figures, tables, appendixes A and B, and references
Main Term(s): Railroads
Index Term(s): Crime prevention measures; Crime specific countermeasures; Domestic terrorism; Facility security; Mass transit security; Railroad law enforcement; Security management; Security standards; Security systems; Threat assessment
Note: Downloaded on March 25, 2008
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.