skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221830 Find in a Library
Title: Taking Care of Business: Public Police as Commercial Security Vendors
Journal: Criminology and Criminal Justice  Volume:8  Issue:1  Dated:February 2008  Pages:27-50
Author(s): Julie Ayling; Clifford Shearing
Date Published: February 2008
Page Count: 24
Sponsoring Agency: Australian Research Council
Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia
Grant Number: DP0450247
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines practices in ‘user-pays’ policing (or public police as commercial security vendors).
Abstract: User-pays or fee-for-service policing is a common and longstanding phenomenon in many jurisdictions. Charges are levied by police for a variety of different services, ranging from the simple provision of information, to special policing services provided on a longer term basis, to services to a particular industry or sector provided by a specialist body of public police. Charging fees for public policing services to private entities enables police to recover at least partially the costs of providing them. Just because public policing now encompasses newer economic forms like user-pays does not necessarily detract from its nature as a public service. This article argues that there is no necessary disjuncture between addressing local or private concerns and more general or public ones. User-pays policing can be, and often is compatible with public interests and the provision of public goods. When this is the case, there may be sound reasons for supporting it. However, user-pays policing can raise the possibility that private interests might have more influence on service provision than is appropriate. Today there are many and varied forms of participation in the market by the public police (State provided policing). Police are both vendors and purchasers of security and its related products. New forms of policing will challenge conceptions of State centrality in the ‘protection domain’ and raise questions about the extent of State regulation that is needed and about the appropriate level of accountability and responsibility for the services provided. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Contract law enforcement; Police compensation; Special purpose public police
Index Term(s): Police reform; Policing innovation; Private police; Privatization
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.