skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221850 Find in a Library
Title: Supermax Prisons: What We Know, What We Do Not Know, and Where We Are Going
Journal: The Prison Journal  Volume:88  Issue:1  Dated:March 2008  Pages:23-42
Author(s): Jesenia M. Pizarro; Raymond E. Narag
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 20
Publisher: http://www.sagepub.com/ 
Type: Literature Review
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on case law and criminal justice research, this article examines the current state of knowledge on supermax prisons, which house inmates considered the "worst of the worst" under maximum-security measures, and assesses the likely future of these facilities.
Abstract: The increased popularity of supermax prisons (44 States operate 1 or more supermax facilities) has been attributed to the decline in the rehabilitation ideal as a primary purpose in corrections and an increase in the ideals of punishment, incapacitation, and deterrence as the purposes of corrections. Prison administrators claim that supermax prisons are effective management tools because they serve as a general deterrent to violence and disturbance within the correctional population; however there is no objective, empirical evidence to support the view that supermax prisons are effective. A major concern of critics of supermax facilities is their effect on inmates' mental health due to the isolation and lack of activity. Only a few studies, however, have directly examined the impact of supermax prisons on the inmates. Challenges to the existence and practices of supermax prisons based on the eighth amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) stem from issues related to the mental health of inmates, the use of force, and conditions of confinement. The courts, however, have repeatedly ruled that the placement of mentally and physically fit inmates in supermax settings does not violate their right against cruel and unusual punishment. Both academic and legal literature suggest that supermax prisons are here to stay. This prediction is only likely to change if future research produces a consensus that supermax prisons are not cost-effective and do in fact have a measurable impact on inmates that rises to the level of cruel and unusual punishment. 61 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Cruel and unusual punishment; Inmate segregation; Maximum security; Prison conditions; Prisoner's rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243735

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.