skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221867 Find in a Library
Title: United States' Policy Analysis on Undercover Operations
Journal: International Journal of Police Science & Management  Volume:9  Issue:4  Dated:Winter 2007  Pages:371-380
Author(s): Georg A. Wagner
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 10
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: After reviewing the history of police undercover practices in the United States, this article examines internal and external policies that guide the use of undercover law enforcement methods, followed by consideration of court cases that had a major impact on undercover officers' behaviors.
Abstract: An undercover officer makes contact with suspected criminals without disclosing his role as a law enforcement officer. He/she obtains evidence of criminal activity that would otherwise remain hidden from police. Such evidence often becomes the foundation for subsequent convictions. Undercover operations are inherently risky, however, in that they may threaten the values given high priority under the U.S. Constitution, such as privacy, civil liberties, property rights, and protection against self-incrimination. The design of some undercover operations, notably those known as "stings," have raised concerns about entrapment, i.e., the enticing of persons to commit crimes they might not have committed without the promptings and actions of undercover officers. For these reasons, undercover agents must be well trained in the legal parameters for undercover work and be carefully monitored in the course of their undercover assignments. This article reviews the court cases that have set the legal parameters for undercover work in the United States. No court case has outlawed undercover work per se, but they have helped to define the nature of entrapment and the conditions under which undercover agents can obtain evidence without a search warrant. 14 references
Main Term(s): Police legal limitations
Index Term(s): Entrapment; Right of privacy; Search and seizure laws; Undercover activity; Undercover training; US Supreme Court decisions; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.