skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 221980 Find in a Library
Title: Social Integration, Self-Control, and Conformity
Journal: Journal of Quantitative Criminology  Volume:24  Issue:1  Dated:March 2008  Pages:73-92
Author(s): Michael R. Welch; Charles R. Tittle; Jennifer Yonkoski; Nicole Meidinger; Harold G. Grasmick
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 20
Publisher: http://www.springer.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using data from a survey of the population of a southwestern city that allowed measurement of two types of social integration, including socially supportive networks, this study examined the link between self-control and social integration and determined whether social integration was linked with misbehavior independently of self-control.
Abstract: The findings indicate that self-control is a persistent predictor of misconduct independently of social integration. Although interpersonal social integration apparently stands alone in association with deviance, community integration showed no relationship with self-control or misbehavior. These findings are similar to those of past similar research that shows self-control and at least some forms of social integration are independently associated with misconduct, which seems to justify further investigation of social support in social integration. Still, caution must be used in drawing conclusions, since the data are cross-sectional, which makes it difficult to assess causal sequences. Also, measurement of some of the variables was less complete than the researchers would have liked. In addition, some aspects of social integration, such as the strength or warmth of relationships, and other relevant factors were not measured. Data were collected during the spring of 1991 as part of the annual Oklahoma City Survey. It was administered to a random sample of 395 adults ages 18 and over, which was reasonably representative of the Oklahoma City population as reflected in the 1990 census. The dependent variables were self-reports of specific past misbehavior and self-estimates of future misconduct. Independent variables were self-control as measured by the Grasmick et al. scale; social integration, as measured by interpersonal and socially supportive bonds, as well as involvement in conventional community activities; and interpersonal integration, based on responses to six items regarding respondents' interpersonal relationships with people who are emotionally close and/or provide emotional support. 4 tables and 103 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Behavior patterns; Oklahoma; Problem behavior; Social cohesion; Social conditions; Socialization
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=243873

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.