skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 221984 Find in a Library
Title: Human Rights Is Not Enough: The Need for Demonstrating Efficacy of an Ethical Approach to Interviewing in India
Journal: Legal and Criminological Psychology  Volume:13  Issue:1  Dated:February 2008  Pages:89-106
Author(s): Laurence Alison; Sudhansu Sarangi; Allison Wright
Date Published: February 2008
Page Count: 18
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study compared attitudes about human rights and support for police coercive interviewing practices among samples of police officers, offenders, and the general public in India.
Abstract: Both police officers and the general public accepted custodial violence and the use of intimidating interrogation strategies more readily than did the offenders. They were also more willing to suspend suspects' human rights. In addition, individuals who scored high on a coercive belief scale were significantly likely to favor custodial violence and to suspend human rights for suspects and offenders. Further, the self-reported frequency with which Indian police officers used intimidating and nonintimidating interviewing techniques was related to their beliefs about and support for suspects' human rights, as well as the extent to which they perceived intimidating interviewing methods to be useful. These findings may suggests that beliefs about the necessity and effectiveness of intimidating interviewing strategies may well be embedded in Indian social-control values. The effectiveness of a human rights agenda requires that Indian police officers be convinced of the effectiveness of ethical interviewing standards as well as the adverse practical and legal consequences of using inappropriate interviewing methods. One hundred police officers, 50 offenders, and 50 members of the general public completed a questionnaire that assessed their attitudes about the suspects' rights and the use of coercion in suspect interviews. Questions solicited demographic information, views on the rights of suspects and the use of custodial violence, and ratings on the usefulness of 14 different interviewing techniques. 3 tables and 42 references
Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Comparative analysis; Human rights; Human rights violations; India; Interview and interrogation; Offender attitudes; Police attitudes; Police interviewing training; Public Attitudes/Opinion; Public Opinion of the Police
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.