skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 222065 Find in a Library
Title: Assessing Vulnerability: Using Both the 'Soft-Non-Scientific' Path and the Scientific Approach to Measuring Critical Infrastructures
Journal: Homeland Defense Journal  Volume:5  Issue:12  Dated:December 2007/January 2008  Pages:42,44,46
Author(s): Robert McCreight Ph.D.; Irmak Renda-Tanali D.Sc.
Date Published: December 2007
Page Count: 4
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article briefly examines the use of ‘soft’ approaches to infrastructure vulnerability assessment and the use of scientific approaches to infrastructure vulnerability assessment.
Abstract: For years, States and local governments have been tackling the task of assessing the vulnerability of their key infrastructures in order to prepare for disasters and mitigate destructive effects. So, it is of significant importance to find ways to enhance the manner in which rituals of infrastructure vulnerability assessments are performed. Strategic approaches towards vulnerability assessments can include formal engineering studies, economic and mathematical models, and more simple evaluations by citizens, industrial leaders, and other experts relying largely on their professional experience. The bottom line is to find an approach that is sensible and understandable by both the citizens, affected by the studies, and emergency managers, who must implement them. The ‘soft’ approach is considered pragmatic, very understandable and basic in terminology and design, and relatively nonscientific or nonmathematical. Soft approaches are ground in practical issues linked directly to the operational status of valuable infrastructures and the strategies employed to safeguard them. Scientific approaches focus on a blend of engineering, risk assessment, and mathematical models that tend to isolate key factors and concentrate on metrics that can be studied and objectively measured.
Main Term(s): Critical Infrastructure Protection; Scientific techniques; Threat assessment
Index Term(s): Civil defense; Domestic terrorism; Evaluation measures; Facility security; National security; Security management; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.