skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 222103 Find in a Library
Title: Understanding Risk in the Context of the Youth Criminal Justice Act
Journal: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice  Volume:49  Issue:4  Dated:October 2007  Pages:465-491
Author(s): Paula Maurutto; Kelly Hannah-Moffat
Date Published: October 2007
Page Count: 27
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: This article explores and analyzes the entry of empirically based risk assessments into the legal arena, with a particular focus on youth pre-sentence reports (PSRs) in Canada.
Abstract: The article concludes that the adoption of risk/need assessment tools in the preparation of PSRs raises a number of questions. Among these is whether risk assessment tools themselves can be legally defensible, given that much of the information collected continues to be marred by subjective and/or moral assumptions. Equally important is whether the courts have the requisite knowledge to interpret risk information properly. The judiciary is rarely provided with adequate training on the various meanings and interpretations of risk scores. Moreover when risk is used to frame rehabilitation in the context of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), it presents the potential for undermining the central premise of proportionate sentencing. Those identified as high-risk may face longer custody or a battery of conditions that offenders accused of similar crimes but presenting fewer needs may be spared. The order imposed to the use of empirically based risk tools shapes and constricts understandings of need and treatment. These concerns are compounded for women and other marginalized groups, specifically Aboriginals. The particular construction of risk and criminogenic needs too often ignores the social, historical, and cultural realities of those less privileged. The use of actuarial tools and sentencing could amount to statistical justice, where dispositions are determined on the basis of how closely a young offender matches some profile of likely offenses rather than on an examination of the actual offense committed. Further scrutiny of any research into the impact of risk, particularly risk tools that are incorporated into the PSR, is required. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Legal reference services; Presentence studies; Risk management
Index Term(s): Assessment (juvenile); Instrument validation; Needs assessment; Testing and measurement
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.