skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222106 Find in a Library
Title: Iran, Terrorism, and Weapons of Mass Destruction
Journal: Studies in Conflict & Terrorism  Volume:31  Issue:3  Dated:March 2008  Pages:169-181
Author(s): Daniel Byman
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 13
Publisher: http://www.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews Iran’s use of terrorism, and analyzes why the United States has been unsuccessful at influencing relations in Iran.
Abstract: Since the Islamic revolution in 1979, Iran has been one of the world's most active sponsors of terrorism. Despite Iran’s support for terrorism for more than 25 years and its possession of chemical weapons for over 15 years, Tehran has not transferred any unconventional systems to terrorists. Iran is likely to continue this restraint and not transfer chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons for several reasons. First, providing terrorists with such unconventional weapons offers Iran few tactical advantages as these groups are able to operate effectively with existing methods and weapons. Second, Iran has become more cautious in its backing of terrorists. And third, it is highly aware that any major escalation in its support for terrorism would incur U.S. wrath and international condemnation. Iran’s use of terrorism has changed dramatically since the 1980s. Most importantly from a U.S. point of view, Iran appears not to target Americans directly, although it still retains the capability to do so. In Iraq, some groups with links to Iran have fought with coalition forces. Instead Iran uses terrorism as a form of deterrence, casing U.S. embassies and other facilities to give it a response should the United States step up pressure. Today, Iran uses terrorism and support for radicals in several distinct ways. Particularly important for the United States are Tehran's close relationship with the Lebanese Hezbollah; support for anti-Israel Palestinian groups; ties to various factions within Iraq; and loose contacts with al Qaeda. Policymakers should recognize that U.S. options with regard to Iranian support for terrorism are limited. The article concludes with recommendations for decreasing Iran’s use of terrorism in general, and the chances of it transferring chemical or other unconventional weapons to terrorists in particular. Appendix
Main Term(s): Intergovernmental relations; Iran; State sponsored terrorism
Index Term(s): Chemical Weapons; International terrorism; Policy; Political impact of terrorism; Revolutionary or terrorist groups; Supporters of terrorism; Terrorist group cooperation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244000

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.