skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222109 Find in a Library
Title: Terrorism and Terrorist Leaders: Insights From Developmental and Ecological Psychology
Journal: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism  Volume:31  Issue:3  Dated:March 2008  Pages:227-250
Author(s): Alice Locicero; Samuel J. Sinclair
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 24
Publisher: http://www.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article describes a common pattern in cognitive complexity among terrorist leaders, using Osama bin Laden as a model.
Abstract: This article proposes a developmental psychological model of the conditions that favor terrorist actions which represent publicly discernible goals ascribed to a political religious cause. Entrenched cognitive simplicity in one key ideological domain (religious or political) is coupled with behavior reflecting the capacity for far greater complexity in other domains (organizational skills, planning problem-solving). Scholarship and theoretical explanations of terrorism have been in demand and have increased since the attacks of September 11, 2001. Using developmental and ecological dailies as a framework, one can create a dynamic model of the kinds of situations that allow communities to see the creation of terror and destruction as a necessary, defensible, and even prosocial activity. This model includes attention to the development of leaders, volunteers, communities of support, and the relationships between communities of support and society at large. The model seems to be a generally good fit for several areas were less powerful groups have engaged in non-state-sponsored terrorism: Spain's Basque area, Northern Ireland, Chechnya, and the Northeast (Tamil) area of Sri Lanka. In several of these conflict situations, one or more leaders of the less powerful group have shown developmental shifts toward the ability to manage increased complexity in leading, or considering, the actions of the group. However, progress in the area of managing a complex organization does not necessarily lead to progress in relation to considerations of political religious ideology. Ability and willingness to negotiate for the sake of peace requires higher levels in the area of ideology, as well as their area of organizational competence. Notes
Main Term(s): Psychological research; Terrorist ideologies; Terrorist profiles
Index Term(s): Behavioral science research; Group behavior; Individual behavior; International terrorism; Northern Ireland; Problem behavior; Religion; Spain; Terrorism causes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244003

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.