skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222207 Find in a Library
Title: Effect of Re-Annealing on the Distribution of Refractive Index in a Windscreen and a Windowpane Classification of Glass Samples
Journal: Forensic Science International  Volume:174  Issue:2-3  Dated:January 2008  Pages:222-228
Author(s): M. Pawluk-Kolc; J. Zieba-Palus; A. Parczewski
Date Published: January 2008
Page Count: 7
Publisher: http://www.elsevier.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Poland
Annotation: This study examined whether differences between the refractive indexes (RIs) of glass fragments of a car windshield and a windowpane could be better distinguished after the samples were re-annealed, which involved repeating a controlled slow cooling of the glass fragments in a specific range of temperatures after prior heating to a selected temperature.
Abstract: The study found that annealing was useful not only for the classification of glass samples but also in distinguishing between glass samples within the same class. For both types of glass, the mean RI was significantly higher after annealing, and standard deviations in RI were smaller. The distributions of RI for both examined objects appeared abnormal; the deviations from normal were observed at both sides of RI distributions. The difference between mean values of RI after annealing and before annealing for both objects was not significant; thus, it would not be a good parameter for differentiating between two heat-strengthened glass objects. The 181 glass samples examined were from car windows (n=72), windowpanes (n=36), headlamps (n=18), optical glass (n=10), table glass (n=10), bottles (n=10), outer part of bulbs (n=10), inner part of bulbs (n=8), and mirrors (n=7). The RI was determined by the thermoimmersion method, using the GRIM 2 system at approximately 589 nm. 5 tables, 11 figures, and 11 references
Main Term(s): Criminology; Poland
Index Term(s): Foreign criminal justice research; Forensic sciences; Glass analysis; Investigative techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244104

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.