skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222308 Find in a Library
Title: Tokenism in Policing: An Empirical Test of Kanter's Hypothesis
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:36  Issue:1  Dated:March/April 2008  Pages:1-10
Author(s): Joseph L. Gustafson
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 10
Publisher: http://www.elsevier.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study provides the first quantitative analysis of tokenism in the municipal police in context.
Abstract: The study found weak to moderate evidence that token officers do experience more visibility and performance pressure than non-token officers, a weak association between gender status and perceptions of contrast and social isolation, and inconclusive evidence that token officers feel their social characteristics limit work roles and advancement opportunities. The most substantial finding came from the multinomial logit model of visibility and performance pressure, in which token male and female officers were 1.5 to 2.5 times more likely than non-token White male officers to agree that they felt more visible and criticized. A weak correlation, in the theoretically-predicted direction, was found between being a female officer and agreeing that gender-related jokes were often made, suggesting that women are more aware of, but and perhaps affected by, discriminatory comments that remind them of their differentness. It may be true that male officers use a subtle strategy to emphasize their commonalities in contrast to female officers, isolating these tokens and keeping them just slightly outside of inner occupational circles. The results of this methodologically-rigorous study may have policy implications for police administrators. If it is determined that tokenism processes are operating in the modern policing field, it may be necessary to reevaluate the current affirmative action in response to gender and racial discrimination. Perhaps affirmative action policies have placed too much emphasis on the numbers alone, without acknowledging some of the institutionalized mechanisms that bring about disparate treatment for women and minority police. Increasing the number of women and minority officers is a positive step, but such efforts may need augmentation, such as cultural sensitivity training. Data were collected from a short self-administered questionnaire related to the police work stress and police stress-related domestic violence for 1,106 full-time sworn officers representing all 9 Baltimore, MD police precincts. Figure, tables, appendix A, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Police affirmative action programs; Police occupational stress; Racial discrimination
Index Term(s): Male/female police officer relations; Maryland; Police personnel; Police subculture; Police-minority relations
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244207

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.