skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 222318 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: DNA Field Experiment: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High-Volume Crimes
Author(s): John K. Roman; Shannon Reid; Jay Reid; Aaron Chalfin; William Adams; Carly Knight
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: April 2008
Page Count: 163
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Grant Number: T-015
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This DNA Field Experiment--which was conducted in five communities (Orange County and Los Angeles, CA; Topeka, KS; Denver, CO; and Phoenix, AZ)--assessed the cost-effectiveness of expanding DNA evidence collection and analysis to the investigation of property crimes.
Abstract: Compared to traditional property-crime investigations, the study found that property-crime cases in which DNA evidence was processed produced more than twice as many suspect identifications, twice as many suspect arrests, and more than twice as many cases accepted for prosecution. DNA evidence was at least five times more likely to result in suspect identification compared with fingerprint evidence. Further, suspects identified with DNA had at least twice as many prior felony arrests and convictions as those identified by traditional investigative techniques. DNA evidence from blood resulted in better case outcomes than DNA from other biological evidence, particularly evidence from items touched or handled. Biological material collected by forensic technicians was no more likely to result in a suspect being identified than biological material collected by patrol officers. The study estimated that it costs $4,502 to identify a suspect via DNA evidence who would otherwise not be identified via traditional investigative techniques. Since investigations that focus on DNA evidence are more costly and involve more evidence for cases to be processed by police, labs, and courts, a substantial investment will be required to expand the capacity of crime laboratories, police, and prosecutors. The study involved the collection of biological evidence at up to 500 crime scenes in each community between November 2005 and July 2007. They included burglaries (residential and business) and theft from automobiles. Random assignment produced an approximate equal split between cases handled with DNA evidence collection and traditional investigative techniques. Chapter tables and figures and 52 references
Main Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis; Police policies and procedures
Index Term(s): Arizona; Auto related offenses; Burglary; California; Colorado; DNA fingerprinting; Evidence collection; Investigative techniques; Kansas; Police effectiveness
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.