skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222343 Find in a Library
Title: Repeatability and Reproducibility of Earprint Acquisition
Journal: Journal of Forensic Science  Volume:53  Issue:2  Dated:March 2008  Pages:325-330
Author(s): Ivo Alberink Ph.D.; Arnout Ruifrok Ph.D.
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 6
Publisher: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study tested the repeatability and reproducibility of earprint acquisition according to "best practices," with attention to the importance of studying operator effects, operator training, and not collecting "matching" reference material at the same time.
Abstract: "Repeatability" refers to whether earprints from the same ear, taken repeatedly under the same circumstances by the same operator, are sufficiently similar. Study findings suggest that different operators may acquire earprints of differing quality, with equal error rates of the matching system ranging from 9 percent to 19 percent. Further, "matching" earprints are more alike when taken in a consecutive row than when taken on separate occasions. This shows the importance of studying operator effects, operator training, and not collecting "matching" reference material on the same occasion. The study, called the Forensic Ear Identification Project, collected a database of 1,229 earprint donors between 2002 and 2005. Three prints per ear were collected according to "best practices" for earprint acquisition. This report presents detailed descriptions of feature extraction and numerical evaluation. The countries participating in the research (Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom) each provided two investigators for the collection of earprints. The analysis focused on the country in which the earprint was taken, the donor of the earprint, the side (left or right) of the earprint, the operator (country of origin and which investigator in each country), and the number of the run (one up to four) in which the earprint was taken. 7 tables, 7 figures, and 7 references
Main Term(s): Criminology; Italy; Netherlands; United Kingdom (UK)
Index Term(s): Criminalistics training; Evidence collection; Foreign criminal justice research; Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques; Suspect identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244242

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.