skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 222357 Find in a Library
Title: On the Discriminability of the Handwriting of Twins
Journal: Journal of Forensic Sciences  Volume:53  Issue:2  Dated:March 2008  Pages:430-446
Author(s): Sargur Srihari Ph.D.; Chen Huang M.S.; Harish Srinivasan M.S.
Date Published: March 2008
Page Count: 17
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2004-IJ-CX-K050
Publisher: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/ 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In order to improve understanding of the individuality of handwriting, this study compared handwriting samples of twins and nontwins, using an automatic handwriting verification system.
Abstract: Results of the verification tests showed that the handwriting of twin siblings was less distinctive from one another than was the handwriting of nontwin siblings. The verification error rate for twins was 12.91 percent compared to 3.7 percent for nontwins. Within the twin sample, error rates for identical twins were higher than for fraternal twins. Error rates in all cases could have been reduced by having the option of rejecting (not making a decision on) borderline cases. The automatic handwriting verification system yielded error rates lower than that of laypersons but higher than that of questioned document examiners based on previous relevant research. With further system improvements, the automatic verification system may achieve the performance of qualified document examiners. Handwriting samples were obtained from 206 twin pairs. Each twin provided a page of handwriting. The verification task consisted of determining whether two half-page documents (original samples divided into upper and lower halves) were written by the same individual. For twins, there were 1,236 verification cases, including 824 tests in which the text content of the writing was different and 412 tests in which the textual content was the same. An additional 1,645 test cases were obtained from handwriting samples of nontwins. In order to make the handwriting comparisons, the automatic handwriting verification system computed overall pictorial attributes (macro features), characteristics of individual letters (micro features), and characteristics of whole-word shapes and letter pairs (style features). Four testing scenarios were assessed: twins and nontwins writing the same text and writing different texts. 14 tables, 16 figures, and 22 references
Main Term(s): Criminology; Handwriting analysis; Twins as research subjects
Index Term(s): Biological influences; Comparative analysis; Document analysis; Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=244256

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.