skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 222368 Find in a Library
Title: Predicting the Psychosocial Effects of Interpersonal Partner Violence (IPV): How Much Does a Woman's History of IPV Matter?
Journal: Journal of Interpersonal Violence  Volume:18  Issue:11  Dated:November 2003  Pages:1271-1291
Author(s): G. Anne Bogat; Alytia A. Levendosky; Sally Theran; Alexander von Eye; William S. Davidson
Date Published: November 2003
Page Count: 21
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 8-7958-MI-IJ
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study explored whether psychosocial indicators and severity of violence could be predicted from a woman's continuity and history of interpersonal partner violence (IPV).
Abstract: This study indicated the importance of assessing the participant’s history of IPV when examining the effects of violence and psychosocial outcomes. Chronicity of violence across partners and time was related to worse psychosocial outcomes and greater severity of IPV. However, recency of IPV and continuity of IPV with one's current partner affected psychosocial outcomes more negatively than more distal indicators of IPV (IPV only with previous partner, and IPV prior to the current pregnancy). Neither recency (last 6 months) nor continuity of IPV with one’s partner fully explained the psychosocial outcomes of participants when examining groups beyond those having no IPV and chronic IPV. The findings suggest that grouping women into IPV versus no IPV based only on experiences during the past six months may inadvertently categorize someone as being nonabused, when in fact they are with partners who have abused them prior to the last 6 months. Future research should attempt to assess retrospective histories of IPV in more detail, but more importantly, perspective, longitudinal studies are needed to examine these issues without the biases inherent in retrospective methodologies. The participants were 205 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse women recruited as part of an ongoing longitudinal study examining risk and resilience factors for IPV in women and children. Figure, table, notes, and references
Main Term(s): Domestic assault; Domestic assault prevention; Domestic violence causes
Index Term(s): NIJ grant-related documents; Social psychology; Victims of violent crime; Violence Against Women Act; Violence causes; Violence prediction
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.