skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 222385 Find in a Library
Title: Whole World is Watching: Camera Phones Put Law Enforcement Under Surveillance
Journal: Law EnforcementTechnology  Volume:35  Issue:2  Dated:February 2008  Pages:40,42,47
Author(s): Mary Erpenbach
Date Published: February 2008
Page Count: 7
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the widespread practice of videotaping law enforcement activities.
Abstract: People are recording encounters with law enforcement with increasing frequency, leaving some officers to feel as if the public now has police departments under surveillance. Law enforcement professionals say that whatever their feelings about being videotaped while they work, most officers are fully aware of the ramifications of how the Internet can be used to generate unfair judgment and publicity; fears about how they will be portrayed in videotape could conceivably affect their on-the-job decisionmaking. For all the concern about camera phones and anti-police videos, though, virtually all law enforcement professionals say the cameras are here to stay and that the positives of the public’s ability to record police officers on the job still outweigh the negatives. The negatives for law enforcement have to do with whether the public is properly informed with respect to the context in which the video is shot. The positives are that the widespread practice of videotaping law enforcement activities may ultimately contribute to a greater public understanding of police work. While police officers do a public job in the public sphere and have little right to any expectation of privacy, many people will stop recording police officers if asked; further, if the recording captures a criminal matter, officers might seize the camera to review for any evidentiary material. Whether departments are affected by camera phones or not, many are implementing venues for disseminating information regarding camera phones, either during roll call or as part of their formal training.
Main Term(s): Camera technology; Police agencies
Index Term(s): Police in-service training; Police legal training; Police recruit training; Police roll call training; Police specialized training; Police training attitudes; Police-media relations training
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.