skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 227862 Find in a Library
Title: Race-Based Peremptory Challenges: An Empirical Analysis of Litigation From the U.S. Court of Appeals, 2002-2006
Journal: American Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:33  Issue:1  Dated:Spring 2008  Pages:59-68
Author(s): Shaun L. Gabbidon; Leslie K. Kowal; Kareem L. Jordan; Jennifer L. Roberts; Nancy Vincenzi
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
Publisher: http://www.springer-sbm.de 
Type: Case Study; Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the features of Federal litigation over the course of 5 years (2002-2006) in which it was alleged that race was used as a factor in removing a prospective juror during the voir dire jury selection process, which allows both the defense and the prosecution to exclude prospective jurors whom they believe will not decide cases fairly.
Abstract: In the case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that race could not be used as a factor in eliminating prospective jurors in the voir dire process. The cases examined for this study all involved claims by appellants that a prospective juror in their cases had been eliminated from sitting on the jury because of his/her race. The most significant finding was that 79 percent of the appellants lost their cases, which means that most of the peremptory challenges at issue were determined by the Federal appellate court to be race neutral. In just over 75 percent of the cases, the attorneys defending themselves against an allegation of race-based peremptory challenges claimed that their challenges were race-neutral. On the whole, the courts accepted the arguments that the peremptory challenges at issue were based on reasons other than the race of the prospective jurors. Nearly two-thirds of the persons removed from the jury pools were Black, with Latinos composing the second largest share of those removed from juries. In those cases in which the court accepted the appellant's argument that a peremptory challenge was based on race, the defense or prosecution removed a racial/ethnic minority individual from the jury pool for a reason that they did not similarly apply to a White prospective juror. Future research should include first-hand observations of the jury selection process, so as to further inform the dynamics of jury selection. 4 tables and 24 references
Main Term(s): Federal courts
Index Term(s): Appellate court decisions; Jury selection; Jury selection challenges; Racial discrimination; Voir dire
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=249871

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.