skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 227945 Find in a Library
Title: Building the Evidence Base for Family Drug Treatment Courts: Results From Recent Outcome Studies
Journal: Drug Court Review  Volume:6  Issue:2  Dated:2009  Pages:53-82
Author(s): Beth L. Green Ph.D.; Carrie J. Furrer Ph.D.; Sonia D. Worcel M.A., M.P.P.; Scott W.M. Burrus Ph.D.; Michael W. Finigan Ph.D.
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Admin (SAMHSA)
Rockville, MD 20857
Contract Number: 270-02-7107
Type: Literature Review; Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on a review of current research on Family Drug Treatment Courts (FDTCs), which are designed to address the multiple needs of families with substance abuse problems being served by the child welfare system, and it summarizes results from four outcome studies of FDTCs.
Abstract: Results from at least four studies of FDTCs found evidence for their effectiveness in assisting and supporting parents in entering, remaining in, and completing substance abuse treatment so they could be reunited with their children; however, different program models achieved different outcome patterns. The Pima County (Arizona) study found positive effects for treatment completion, family reunification, and reduced times to permanent placement. Two other programs showed consistent positive treatment and child welfare outcomes. Neither of these two sites produced reduced time to permanent placements. The two most successful sites were longstanding FDTCs whose models aligned closely with the core program elements supported by organizations such as the National Association of Drug Court Professionals and the Bureau of Justice Assistance. They all used an integrated judicial processing system. Although reasons for site differences were difficult to determine, the results suggest that the integrated, traditional family drug court model may be more effective than other variations. Further research is needed in order to identify and systematically test such model differences, in order to develop an understanding of what features of the FDTC are most important for achieving intended outcomes. This article summarizes the findings of completed FDTC outcome studies, including one unpublished report and two published reports. Results are also presented from a recently completed, large-scale outcome study (Worcel, Green, Furrer, Burrus, and Finigan, 2008). Four of the sites studied were in San Diego, CA; Santa Clara County, CA; Suffolk County, NY; and Washoe County, NV. 2 tables and 30 references
Main Term(s): Drug Courts
Index Term(s): California; Child protection services; Children of drug abusers; Drug treatment programs; Effectiveness; Family courts; Nevada; New York; Parent-Child Relations
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.