skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 227966 Find in a Library
Title: Accountability and Dignity: Ethical Issues in Forensic and Correctional Practice
Journal: Aggression and Violent Behavior  Volume:14  Issue:4  Dated:July/August 2009  Pages:227-231
Author(s): Tony Ward; Astrid Birgden
Date Published: July 2009
Page Count: 5
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This introduction to the special issue on “Ethical Issues in Forensic and Correctional Psychology” provides an appropriate theoretical framework for an investigation of the ethical concerns in the forensic and correctional practice domains.
Abstract: The article first outlines an ethical framework that is intended to help practitioners reflect systematically on their practice (Ward and Syversen, 2009). The Ward and Syversen ethical framework is a stepwise one, with the concept of human dignity at the center, alongside ethical resources such as human rights, normative theories, and punishment. At the next level are the normative principles typically found in ethnical codes, such as beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. This leads to the next level, which involves specific standards or rules found in ethical codes, laws, or institutional procedures. The final and most concrete level of analysis is that of individual judgments made by practitioners in correctional and forensic domains in practice. After outlining this ethical framework, the article examines the relationship between two normative frameworks evident within the criminal justice system, i.e., punishment and rehabilitation. The notable feature of the Ward and Syversen ethical framework is based upon the concept of dignity and its protection by higher level moral norms such as human rights and the principles of well-being. It insists that both the administration of punishment and treatment with offenders are delivered in a way that illustrates respect for the moral equality of offenders, victims, and the rest of the community. The article concludes with summaries of the articles in the issue. 1 figure and 10 references
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Code of ethics; Corrections psychological training; Ethics training; Forensic psychology; Professional conduct and ethics
Note: For other articles in this issue, see NCJ 227967-71.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.