skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 227967 Find in a Library
Title: Values in Forensic and Correctional Psychology
Journal: Aggression and Violent Behavior  Volume:14  Issue:4  Dated:July/August 2009  Pages:232-238
Author(s): Andrew Day; Sharon Casey
Date Published: July 2009
Page Count: 7
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This article discusses the relevance of values in forensic and correctional psychology, with a focus on their implications for rehabilitation.
Abstract: The authors first define "values" as consisting of “concepts or beliefs about desirable end states or behaviors that transcend specific situations, guide the selection or evaluation of behavior and events, and are ordered by relative importance” (Schwartz and Bilsky, 1987). The article then considers the relationship between values and behavior, particularly antisocial behavior, and the way in which offending can be understood in relation to values and how these impact upon the therapeutic process. The authors argue that changing values of an offender is an important part of the process of changing antisocial behavior. When personal values radically conflict with social and legal norms, behavior labeled antisocial and criminal emerges, because such behavior leads to the violation of the human rights of other members of the community. Working effectively with offenders on changing their values for their benefit and the benefit of the larger society requires a strong commitment to ethical practice. The practitioner has an obligation to respect the client’s right to dignity and autonomy, while simultaneously challenging values that are antisocial. If offenders are asked to account for the values that they hold, then it should be expected that rehabilitation providers’ values are at issue as well. The values held by the forensic psychologist become part of the rehabilitative encounter, so it is legitimate for offenders to challenge these values or seek to understand them better. The aim is to reach agreement on the circumstances or conditions under which the right to choose how to live one’s life should be restricted. 1 table and 84 references
Main Term(s): Corrections psychological training
Index Term(s): Forensic psychology; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychologists role in corrections
Note: For other article in this issue, see NCJ 227966 and NCJ 227968-71.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.