skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 227970 Find in a Library
Title: Where the Home in the Valley Meets the Damp Dirty Prison: A Human Rights Perspective on Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Role of Forensic Psychologists in Correctional Settings
Journal: Aggression and Violent Behavior  Volume:14  Issue:4  Dated:July/August 2009  Pages:256-263
Author(s): Astrid Birgden; Michael L. Perlin
Date Published: July 2009
Page Count: 8
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: Netherlands
Annotation: This paper offers guidance for approaching a balance between offender rights and community rights in the roles of forensic psychologists, who act not only as treatment providers but as organizational consultants on behalf of community safety.
Abstract: The first section of the paper provides an overview of international human rights laws as applied to corrections. It warns that serious ethical problems may arise if such laws are violated. An example is provided of the role of psychologists in the torture and interrogation of military detainees in the United States. The authors argue that the American Psychological Association weighted the balance toward community rights (as organizational consultant) and against detainee rights (as treatment provider), thus disregarding international law. The paper’s second section describes universal ethical principles that ought to assist forensic psychologists in corrections in order to balance offender rights and community rights. If ethics codes were to be underpinned by enforceable universally shared human values regarding dignity and rights, such conflicts would be less likely to arise. The authors propose therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) as a new model by which the ultimate impact of the law on offenders can be assessed. TJ requires that rules, procedures, and roles be reshaped so as to enhance their therapeutic potential without subordinating due process legal principles. The third section of the paper proposes that TJ be used to clarify the role of forensic psychologists by promoting the therapeutic effects of the law through the promotion of offenders’ human rights. 38 references
Main Term(s): Corrections psychological training
Index Term(s): Community Responses (crime prevention); Corrections policies; Forensic psychology; Human rights; Professional conduct and ethics; Psychologists role in corrections
Note: For other articles in this issue, see NCJ 227966-69 and NCJ 227971.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.