skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 227979 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Peer-to-Peer Accountability
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:78  Issue:8  Dated:August 2009  Pages:12-19
Author(s): Jennifer Bills; Ke Ching-Chung; Roy Heringer; Dave Mankin
Date Published: August 2009
Page Count: 8
Publisher: https://www.fbi.gov 
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article explores modeling ethical behavior and making ethical decisions regarding policy and police practice.
Abstract: During the decisionmaking process, law enforcement officers consider applicable Federal, State, and local laws; department policy; and their morals which influence decisionmaking. Law enforcement officers must be able to distinguish ethical dilemmas from moral temptations. They have an obligation to confront peers they believe have committed a professional transgression. Such accountability clearly endures where perceived wrongdoing might question a fellow officer's integrity or tarnish the reputation of the respective agency, or worse, the entire profession. Supervisors at all levels of an organization should uniformly train, stress, and enforce clear comprehension of the law and departmental policies, rules of conduct, and memoranda of understanding. Agencies must aggressively confront misconduct issues and vigorously educate personnel to avoid future impropriety at all levels. Peers, as well as supervisors, should remain vigilant about malfeasance, or pending actions of it, and have the fortitude to sway the person in question away from such behavior. If the employee cannot be deterred from the misconduct, fellow officers should always report the situation. 14 endnotes
Main Term(s): Police decisionmaking; Professional conduct and ethics
Index Term(s): Law Enforcement Education Program; Police attitudes; Police Brutality; Police community relations; Police corruption; Police discipline; Police discretion; Police effectiveness; Police internal affairs; Police management; Police misconduct; Police professionalism; Police reform; Police stress training; Police subculture; Police supervision; Police training programs; Police training standards
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=249991

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.