skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228004 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Stages of Change and the Group Treatment of Batterers
Author(s): Pamela C. Alexander
Date Published: March 2007
Page Count: 67
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
Grant Number: 2004-WG-BX-0001
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study compared the following two treatment methods on their effectiveness in reducing men's violence against their intimate partners: a stages-of-change (SOC) treatment approach supplemented by motivational interviewing techniques and a standard cognitive-behavioral therapy gender-re-education (CBTGR).
Abstract: The study found that self-reported aggression at posttreatment was unrelated to treatment condition; however, based on victim followup reports, the SOC curriculum was more effective than standard CBTGR treatment in reducing women's risk for physical aggression from their male partners, especially among English-speakers. The SOC condition was particularly effective for first-time offenders, for men who were court-ordered to treatment, and for men in an earlier underlying stage of change. On the other hand, the SOC condition was no more effective than the CBTGR condition in reducing the violence of men with multiple admissions, histories of trauma, or source of referral as a function of their assignment to different treatment conditions. The SOC condition was based on a motivational intervening model that included the use of open-ended questions, asking about both positive and negative aspects of the problem, listening reflectively, being willing to revise these reflections upon clarification from the client, highlighting discrepancies between clients' values and their behavior, affirming a client's efforts to change, and reflecting upon his ambivalence about changing. The CBTGR condition emphasized presenting reasons why clients should change their behavior. The sample consisted of 528 batterers, 96.1 percent of whom were court-ordered to treatment. They were randomly assigned to a total of 19 English-speaking groups in the SOC conditions (200 men); 16 English-speaking groups in the CBTGR conditions (175 men); 4 Spanish-speaking groups in the SOC conditions (47 men); and 10 Spanish-speaking groups in the CBTGR condition (106 men). Criteria for treatment outcomes are explained. 9 tables, 9 figures, 115 references, and appended therapist adherence items
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Abusing spouses; Cognitive therapy; Comparative analysis; NIJ final report; Personal interviews; Spouse abuse treatment programs; Treatment effectiveness; Treatment techniques
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.