skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228011 Find in a Library
Title: Impact of the High Range PCA Guideline Judgement on Sentencing for PCA Offences in NSW
Author(s): Stephanie d'Apice
Date Published: November 2008
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
Publication Number: ISBN 978-1-921306-66-2
Sale Source: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research
Level 8, St James Centre
111 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000,
Australia
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Book (Softbound)
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: This bulletin assesses the impact of a guideline judgment issued by the New South Wales (NSW) Court of Criminal Appeal for the offense of high-range prescribed concentration of alcohol (PCA), which pertains to one of the most serious summary offenses addressed by local courts under the NSW Safety and Traffic Management Act of 1999.
Abstract: The NSW guideline judgment system was created in response to criticisms about inconsistencies and leniency in sentencing outcome for particular offenses. As a result of perceived systemic leniency in sentencing, the Attorney General applied to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA) for a guideline judgment for the offense of high-range PCA. In its decision, the CCA held that courts were not imposing sentences that reflected the objective seriousness of the offense. Accordingly, in September 2004, a five-judge bench of the CCA delivered a guideline judgment for the offense of high-range PCA. In issuing the guideline judgment, the CCA constructed features of an ordinary case of high-range PCA for use as a model against which a sentencing court could determine whether the case being considered was similar or more/less severe. The CCA also presented two important principles regarding appropriate penalty types for an ordinary high-range PCA. First, the court held that although nonconviction orders could be used in cases of high-range PCA offenses, their use was rarely appropriate. The court also held that the automatic period of license disqualification was always appropriate unless there was good reason to reduce the disqualification period, such as the nature of the offender’s employment. The findings of the study of the impact of this guideline judgment show that it has been effective in increasing the severity and consistency of sentencing for high-range PCA offenses. 11 figures, 3 tables, 5 notes, and 2 references
Main Term(s): Court statistics
Index Term(s): Driving Under the Influence (DUI); Foreign criminal justice research; New South Wales; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing factors; Sentencing guidelines
Note: Crime and Justice Bulletin, No. 123, November 2008
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250023

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.