skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228043 Find in a Library
Title: Risky Intelligence
Journal: International Journal of Police Science & Management  Volume:11  Issue:3  Dated:Autumn 2009  Pages:324-333
Author(s): Nick Keane; Maren Eline Kleiven
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 10
Type: Historical Overview; Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article reviews the evolution of intelligence-led policing in the United Kingdom, arguing that the current concept of intelligence as “information which leads to a crime detection” is excluding intelligence relevant to important police responsibilities.
Abstract: This article argues that in evolving to focus on increasing the detection of crimes that are being or have been committed, the current view of intelligence-led policing is ignoring “community intelligence,” which is more about managing risk than increasing detection. The concept of “community” intelligence stems from the view of intelligence offered by Innes, Fielding, and Cope (2005), which consists of four levels: criminal, crime, community, and contextual. “Criminal” relates to the activities of a known suspect or offenders; “crime” pertains to a specific crime or series of crimes; “community” intelligence involves information from a community member or issues within the community; and “contextual” intelligence relates to wider social, cultural, or economic factors that may impact crime. One of the most recent examples of how “community” intelligence differs from “crime” and “criminal” intelligence is found in the outbreaks of disorder in Birmingham, England, in October 2005. The Lozells area of Birmingham is composed of people from many cultural backgrounds. In autumn 2005, a rumor circulated within Lozells that a 13-year-old Jamaican girl had been gang-raped in a local beauty salon by Pakistani men. The current focus of intelligence-led policing, which is designed to assist police officers in detecting crime, would aim to prove either the truthfulness of the source of the information or the content of the information. The rumor, however, resulted in outbreaks of disorder between the ethnic communities, involving four stabbings and two men being shot, one a police officer. What was needed was information about the risk for community violence stemming from the rumor. 29 references
Main Term(s): Police intelligence operations
Index Term(s): Community involvement; Community policing; Foreign police; Intelligence acquisition; Intelligence analysis; Intelligence-crime relationships
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.