skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228045 Find in a Library
Title: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: Planners and Instigators or Foot Soldiers?
Journal: International Journal of Police Science & Management  Volume:11  Issue:3  Dated:Autumn 2009  Pages:345-357
Author(s): Philip Caine
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 13
Publisher: http://www.vathek.com 
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study assessed the effectiveness of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in fulfilling its mandate to prosecute those most responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed during the conflicts in the Former Yugoslavia.
Abstract: The research found that prosecutorial policy in selecting individuals to investigate and potentially prosecute was influenced by factors and influences beyond the control of the prosecutor. Apart from Slobodan Milosevic and Tadovan Karadzic, none of the other "big guns" of the Balkans conflicts has been taken to The Hague for proceedings before the ICTY. Although this may be considered a failure of the ICTY, this research indicates that insufficient resources available to the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), coupled with a weak mandate, has prevented the collection of sufficient evidence to indict the highest-level perpetrators. The OTP was drawn into a spiral in which the necessary pursuit of evidence led to the indictment of lower level suspects. The trials of these suspects consumed limited resources, which impeded pursuit of the highest-level perpetrators. Still, this research shows that the ICTY has achieved much in the field of international justice over the past 14 years. Numerous trials have been conducted in full compliance with the principles of fair trial; ICTY jurisprudence has provided clarification of many aspects of international substantive criminal law; and the ICTY has established a set of rules of procedure that govern pretrial, trial, and appellate proceedings. It is essential that the international community learn lessons from the experience of the ICTY, so as to ensure that future tribunals are given sufficient time and resources for the performance of their mandates. This research combined a literature-based assessment of the ICTY, along with focused interviews with the main decisionmakers in the OTP. 27 references
Main Term(s): Court procedures
Index Term(s): International criminal tribunals; International law; International law of war; International organizations; Netherlands; Prosecution; Yugoslavia (Pre-1992)
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250057

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.