skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228108 Find in a Library
Title: Alternatives for Youth's Advocacy Program: Reducing Minority Youth Incarceration Placements in Cleveland, Ohio
Journal: Juvenile and Family Court Journal  Volume:59  Issue:3  Dated:Summer 2008  Pages:1-17
Author(s): Christopher A. Mallett; Linda Julian
Date Published: 2008
Page Count: 17
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reports on the results of an innovative legal advocacy program representing primarily minority, felony-offending youth within the juvenile court of Cuyahoga County, OH.
Abstract: Results found that the Alternatives for Youth’s Advocacy Program (AFY) reduced detention center placement days by 47 percent and decreased State facility incarceration days by 74 percent (total cost savings $625,898). AFY addresses juvenile delinquents using a holistic approach the includes the provision of civil legal representation to assist youths in accessing disability services and defense attorney support in dispositional planning to reduce juvenile offender placements. Half of the youths involved in AFY were in need of mental health and/or special education disability services, provided for through the program’s advocacy and representation efforts. These disability and vocational services identified youth through evaluations, family work, and legal advocacy and helped many of the youths avoid further juvenile justice system penetration. While no panacea, the addition of the AFY program provided these youths with efforts and advocacy comparable to what all offenders receive from the public defender’s office (or assigned counsel) and subsequently from the juvenile court; however, AFY acted in a more timely and thorough fashion, giving each youth and family the opportunity to identify current needs. Tables and references
Main Term(s): Juvenile offenders; Ohio; Youth advocacy organizations
Index Term(s): Behavior patterns; Behavioral and Social Sciences; Individual behavior; Juvenile Delinquent behavior; Juvenile detention; Juvenile detention rates; Juvenile detention reform; Juvenile Recidivism; Juvenile recidivism prediction; Juvenile recidivism statistics; Preventive detention; Problem behavior; Recidivism causes; Recidivism statistics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.