skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228133 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: From Policy to Practice: State Methamphetamine Precursor Control Policies
Author(s): Jean O’Connor J.D., M.P.H.; Jamie ChriquiPh.D., M.H.S.; Duane McBride Ph.D.; Shelby Smith Eidson J.D.; Carissa Baker; Yvonne Terry-McElrath M.S.; Curt VanderWaal Ph.D.
Date Published: March 2007
Page Count: 142
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0028
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study provides an overview of State laws intended to restrict access to selected precursor chemicals used to produce methamphetamine in small labs.
Abstract: By October 1, 2005, just over half of the States had adopted and implemented a range of methamphetamine precursor control laws in an attempt to reduce the extent and consequences of domestic production; however, there is significant variation in these laws across geographical regions of the country. Western States have generally developed more extensive precursor laws than eastern States. This a reflection of the trends in domestic methamphetamine production, which have shifted rapidly from west to east. There is also significant variation in State legal approaches for controlling small toxic labs; for example, some States have used controlled substances scheduling laws to restrict access to primary methamphetamine precursors. Other States have enacted separate laws aimed specifically at the retail sale environment of these products and the amount that can be purchased. Other States have taken a deterrence approach by criminalizing the possession of precursors, establishing new penalties for possession, designating State agencies to enforce the laws, and establishing uniform statewide enforcement schemes through pre-emptive provisions. These variations in legislative approaches could have implications for the likelihood of State and regional effectiveness in controlling the domestic manufacture of methamphetamine. This report is a first step in a more comprehensive examination of State methamphetamine precursor policies. The larger study aims to identify, analyze, and report on the restrictiveness and policy types of State methamphetamine precursor chemical laws designed to reduce domestic methamphetamine production; examine the perceived impact of these laws; and analyze the associations between the types and extensiveness of precursor laws and reductions in methamphetamine-related lab and precursor chemical seizures, as well as consequences associated with the presence of these labs in local communities. 6 figures, 4 tables, and 81 references
Main Term(s): Drug manufacturing; Methamphetamines
Index Term(s): Drug law enforcement; Drug laws; State laws
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.