skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 228201 Find in a Library
Title: Forensic Analysis of Footwear Impression Evidence
Author(s): Michael B. Smith
Date Published: July 2009
Page Count: 10
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Quantico, VA 22135
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Laboratory Branch
2501 Investigation Parkway
Quantico, VA 22135
United States of America
Document: HTML
Type: Report (Technical)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper discusses the purpose, procedures, and validation of the forensic analysis of footwear impression evidence.
Abstract: The basis for footwear impression evidence is the determination of the source of a footwear impression recovered from a crime scene. The process of examining footwear impression evidence takes into account class and identifying characteristics. Class characteristics result from the manufacturing process, such as physical size, design, and mold characteristics. Identifying characteristics, on the other hand, do not result from the manufacturing process, but are accidental, unpredictable characteristics that result from the wearing of the footwear. This can include the impression of objects that have become attached to the outsole or marks on the outsole caused by cuts, nicks, gouges, and scratches. A match between the class characteristics of the footwear that made an impression at a crime scene and a known shoe can only conclude that the known shoe “could have made” the questioned footwear impression. Identifying characteristics and their orientation and placement on the outsole, however, provide a more convincing correspondence between a known shoe and the footwear impression at the crime scene, even though additional identifying marks may have been made on the known shoe since the time of the crime. Some researchers (Stone, 2006) have developed mathematic models for predicting the frequency of accidental common characteristics of footwear impressions and a known shoe. These models support the extreme rarity of such accidental identical features. The paper’s section on validation contains mathematical formulas that can be used to determine the probability that the features of a given footwear impression at a crime scene were made by a known shoe. 24 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques; Shoe prints and tire tracks; Suspect identification
Note: From Forensic Science Communications, V 11, N 3, July 2009; downloaded September 1, 2009.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=250218

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.